Policy Debate Off Case Arguments

It is generally presented in the first pro constructive a case will often include either the resolution or a rephrasing of it.

Policy debate off case arguments. The basic shell should contain the link internal link impact and uniqueness arguments. Debater should fulfill in a debate. One of the stock issues in policy debate. And it is equivalent to the direct line by line responses that you make.

A subreddit for policy debate cx i understand the competitive drive that comes with policy but we need to step back and be better than saying hurtful things like i wish this happened earlier or other offputting statements that validate conflict. They are generally flowed on a separate sheet of paper each and read before case arguments. Off case arguments made include topicality disadvantages counter plans and kritiks. Disadvantages are first presented in the 1nc as off case positions.

The case is the advocacy established by the pro in the first affirmative. These include topicality counterplans and disadvantages. Negative arguments that while not directly responding to the affirmative s case point by point are offered as significant reasons for rejecting the case or plan for example countervalues kritics value objections disadvantages topicality and counter plans. Disadvantages are the easiest of the off case arguments for new students to understand so i suggest starting with those.

Off case arguments are like topicality disads cps kritiks and theory. In policy debate this typically refers to the fact that the second negative constructive and first negative rebuttalist address different arguments in those speeches. Policy debate is strategic argument between two teams on a given topic. The other type of argument against a case is on case.

They are so named because they are not directly responsive to the arguments made by the 1ac. In debate which is a form of argument competition a case sometimes known as plan is a textual advocacy presented in form of speech by the pro team as a normative or should statement. It is the job of the affirmative team to point this out. What is policy debate.

The negative generally also goes on case contesting the advantage scenarios presented by the affirmative in the 1ac also often contesting solvency and or inherency. Off case arguments sometimes called on plan arguments are policy debate arguments presented by the negative in the 1nc. Since all cases do not spend money i suggest also having a disadvantage that is specific to regulations such as federalism which argues that it is bad for the federal government to regulate state education policy. Off case arguments are arguments that you make that show some problem with the other team s case that doesn t directly attack it.

Sometimes debaters will forget to demonstrate support for one of the parts.